Author Topic: Windows NT  (Read 1285 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Shadow Queen

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 113
  • Respect: +1/-1
  • Gender: Female
  • Hello, Staff & Members!
    • My Kingdom
Windows NT
« on: September 27, 2011, 12:26:03 PM »
Do we have a Windows NT out there?


I never heard of it before.

Offline Nesa

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • Respect: +23/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2011, 06:55:27 PM »
All new windows are based of NT, the only ones called NT were Windows NT 3, 3.5 and 4 then came Windows 2000 (NT version 5).
Windows XP (NT version 5.1) Vista (NT Version 6) Windows 7 (NT version 6.1)

Offline Shadow Queen

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 113
  • Respect: +1/-1
  • Gender: Female
  • Hello, Staff & Members!
    • My Kingdom
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2011, 07:30:18 PM »
O, I didn't know that.


NT be all windows then.


What about the older version windows? Does them have NT too Beside the new ones.

Offline Nesa

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • Respect: +23/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2011, 08:34:19 PM »
Not all are NT based their are the 9x as well
Windows 98
Windows ME

Windows 95 isn't really a OS its a GUI for DOS but that one as well.

Offline bigguy

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2652
  • Respect: +38/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2011, 09:37:20 PM »
Wasn't windows 95 a gui for Win 3.1 not dos.  And in turn win 3.1 was a gui for Dos. Or am I wrong. ??? All the same thing really up until they started using NT.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2011, 09:39:46 PM by bigguy »

Offline Nesa

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • Respect: +23/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2011, 10:51:23 PM »
I remember someone saying you can't install windows 95 without dos I'm about to test that on VMware.
I had Windows 95 running without 3.11 installed.

Offline bigguy

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2652
  • Respect: +38/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2011, 07:26:18 AM »
Dos was always  the underlying o/s but I do remember being able to upgrade win 3.1 to win 95

Offline Nesa

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • Respect: +23/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2011, 06:42:46 AM »
Needed a boot disk but it did install without dos.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2011, 06:52:20 AM by Nesa »

Offline bigguy

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2652
  • Respect: +38/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2011, 10:43:10 PM »
Dos is embedded in Win95 is it not. ???

Offline Nesa

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • Respect: +23/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2011, 10:44:21 PM »
From what I was told it wasn't but it looks like it is, thats version C

Offline bigguy

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2652
  • Respect: +38/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2011, 10:46:03 PM »
There was 4 versions of 95. There was the upgrade version and then a, b, c.

Offline Nesa

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • Respect: +23/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2011, 10:54:25 PM »
Probably B was only sold to OEM, so you could only buy A and C

Offline bigguy

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2652
  • Respect: +38/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2011, 10:56:32 PM »
Possible, I can't remember now. Man is that going back a long way....I still remember using Dos, lol. 

Offline Nesa

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • Respect: +23/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2011, 11:03:42 PM »
Yes DOS and DOS Shell I ran windows 3.11 on my 486 one day I decided to do some cleaning of the hard disk and deleted command.com autoexect.bat and a third one that I can't remember.
Also installing a cd-rom in my pc it was a 12 speed(fastest one at the time) no plug and play, it took dad a while to edit the right files.
The good old days.

Offline bigguy

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2652
  • Respect: +38/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Windows NT
« Reply #14 on: October 02, 2011, 11:10:52 PM »
Damn I can't remember that third one either but it was always those three that had problems. I loved editing all those files and gettin right technical. My last small computer that ran dos was a 486DX66 The 66 was the mhz of the cpu, lmao.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal